User menu

Utility Nav

User menu


Worldview Weekend

The World's Premier Biblical Worldview, Web-Based, Radio, and Television Network.
Ozarks 2020
Spring 2020 Share-A-Thon is Here!
Please Help & Donate Today 901-825-0652

Click Here to Donate by Credit Card


Click Here to Donate with Paypal


Or partner with us by making a tax-deductible monthly contribution

ACLU Defends Right to Life for Terrorists, Not Babies

Robert Knight

ACLU Defends Right to Life for Terrorists, Not Babies

Seriously. The ardently pro-abortion organization declares in its August 30 lawsuit against the Obama administration that the CIA's plan for targeted killings of terrorists violates the terrorists' rights.
"The right to life is the most fundamental of all rights," says ACLU lawyer Arthur Spitzer in the complaint, filed in U.S. District Court in Washington, DC.


While this tack might annoy the folks in the ACLU's Reproductive Freedom Project, it's got to be music to the ears of Anwar al-Awlaki, the American-born, al-Qaeda-linked Muslim cleric hiding in Yemen. Al-Awlaki has been tied to at least two of the 9/11 hijackers and to the Fort Hood shooter, Maj. Nidal Hasan, before Hasan slaughtered 13 of his fellow soldiers and an unborn baby on November 5, 2009. After the incident, al-Awlaki pronounced Hasan a "hero."
The CIA put out a "kill" order on al-Awlaki in early 2010, according to the suit, which was filed by the Center for Constitutional Rights and the ACLU. It asks U.S. District Judge John Bates to order the government to stop any plot to kill al-Awlaki. That might delay the fond wish of Hasan, who told al-Awlaki in one of the captured e-mails, "I can't wait to join you in the afterlife." Of course, Hasan himself is still in this life, too, facing murder charges.
"U.S. citizens have a right to know what conduct may subject them to execution at the hands of their own government," Mr. Spitzer wrote. "Due process requires, at a minimum, that citizens be put on notice of what may cause them to be put to death by the state.... Both the Constitution and international law prohibit targeted killing except as a last resort to protect against concrete, specific, and imminent threats."
Given al-Awlaki's colorful past, one would think he would qualify under "concrete, specific, and imminent."
Justice Department spokesman Matthew Miller said in a statement: "The U.S. is careful to ensure that all its operations used to prosecute the armed conflict against those forces, including lethal operations, comply with all applicable laws, including the laws of war."
By the way, the ACLU's Reproductive Freedom Project page -- which celebrates Roe v. Wade, excoriates abstinence-based sex education, and hails Obama's expansion of taxpayer-funded complicity in abortions -- does not display the "right to life" phrase. It does have a "Tweet to close Gitmo!" button.
Perhaps the ACLU would look more kindly on taking out terrorists if the CIA renamed the operation the "Selective Retroactive Abortion Project."