Senator Obama, Citizen of the WorldBy Thomas E. BrewtonEuropean socialists and Middle Eastern Muslims are wildly  enthusiastic about Senator Obama, because he styles himself a citizen  of the world who, like all liberal-progressive-socialists, aims for  world government.American liberal-progressive-socialism, in the person of Senator  Obama, is a carbon copy of European socialism, and Islamic jihadists  recognize that socialism offers no opposition to their ruthless jihad  to enslave the entire world.For historical perspective, let's look to one of France's leading  socialist theoreticians, the late Jean-François Revel.  As I wrote at  the time of M. Revel's death in May, 2006:http://www.thomasbrewton.com/index.php/weblog/ jean_francois_revel_how_democracies_perish/"Jean-François Revel, who died last week at the age of 82, was that  exceedingly rare person: a French intellectual who didn't despise the  United States, an intellectual who understood the cancerous prognosis  of liberalism."Revel's 1983 "How Democracies Perish" described liberalism's  debilitating effect on confronting the threat of domination by the  Soviet Union.  His observations apply equally today in our long-term  struggle against Islamic jihad."Revel wrote about democracy, meaning societies unhinged from  historical tradition, in which people come to accept the idea that a  constitution is nothing more than the latest social-justice fad  formulated by intellectuals.  That is a 20th century derangement,  very different from what the Constitution instituted: a Federal  republic with power divided between the states and the national  government and split, within the national government, among the three  main branches; a constitutional government designed to protect the  rights of individuals against PC tyranny of the majority."Earlier, in 1970, Revel had a sharply different, eagerly  accommodating view of the nascent Baby Boomer cultural, educational,  and political revolution in the United States.  He happily foresaw a  worldwide revolution spreading from this nation and transforming the  world.The ensuing thirteen years, however, were severely disillusioning to  him, leading to the reassessment quoted above.What was his assessment in 1970?Contrary to the hate-Bush party line, Europeans have despised the  United States at least since the early 1960s.  Describing the typical  European perspective, Revel wrote in "Without Marx or  Jesus" (published in 1970):"On the one hand, there is America, the citadel of reaction; and, on  the other hand, there is the rest of the world – the revolutionary  camp, composed of everyone who resists America...The basis for such a  division of the world, obviously, is the opposition between  capitalism and socialism...And, since imperialism is a necessary  concomitant of capitalism, it is clear that the United States will  move toward socialism only if it is forced to do so from  without...Thus the spirit of revolution and anti-Americanism become  synonymous."In 1970, Revel had high hopes for the late 1960s cultural anarchy in  the United States: the Cal-Berkeley Free Speech Movement, SDS,  Weatherman, the Reverend Martin Luther King's civil right campaign,  feminism, homosexual outing, the black power groups, and the push for  abortion, no-fault divorce, and sexual promiscuity.  All of these, he  anticipated, would lead to full-fledged socialism in the United  States and would become the model for the remainder of the world.The particular relevance of M. Revel's 1970 analysis, with respect to  Senator Obama's public relations tour of the Middle East and Europe,  has to do with the Senator's speech in Berlin.  To roars of approval  from the socialist throng in the Tiergarten, he declared:"I come to Berlin as so many of my countrymen have come before.  Tonight, I speak to you not as a candidate for President, but as a  citizen -- a proud citizen of the United States, and a fellow citizen  of the world."Citizen of the world is liberal-progressive-socialist code for world  government, the fundamental socialist goal impelling the 1960s  student anarchism.  This became the foundation for Senator Obama's  cultural and political doctrine.  Underlying Senator Obama's  continual refrain of change is M. Revel's 1970 expectation:"With respect to the second world revolution [originating during the  1960s in the United States], it is clear that it can have only one  goal, on which all other goals, however numerous, must depend.  And  that single goal is the establishment of world government...On that,  depends all else, including the establishment of economic equality  and the abolition of social classes..."In other words, bringing us together and transcending racial barriers  is to be accomplished by moving toward world government.This goal of world government has been prominently in evidence since  Senator John Kerry's 2004 presidential campaign emphasizing  "sensitive" foreign policy, in which the United States is to take no  international action not approved by all of its purported allies and  by the UN.Senator Obama in his Berlin speech echoed Senator Kerry:"Yes, there have been differences between America and Europe. No  doubt, there will be differences in the future. But the burdens of  global citizenship continue to bind us together. A change of  leadership in Washington will not lift this burden. In this new  century, Americans and Europeans alike will be required to do more --  not less. Partnership and cooperation among nations is not a choice;  it is the one way, the only way, to protect our common security and  advance our common humanity."Again, M. Revel's assessment clarifies and amplifies both liberal- progressive-socialist denunciation of President Bush's foreign  policies and the implications of world government espoused by Senator  Obama:"...we can conclude that the abolition of what we call foreign policy  will be one of the essential components of the future world  revolution.  And it will also be the key to all other changes that  constitute the revolution...The second world revolution will  therefore consist in putting an end to that notion which is the  source of all evil: the notion of national sovereignty...only  multilateral agreement on reciprocal controls, leading to planetary  multinational law, will allow us to escape safely from this absurd  situation.  Bilateral accords must be avoided like the plague, for  they are only the framework for warlike foreign policies, local  hegemony, or imperialistic domination..."Whether one supports the liberal-progressive agenda or not, there  must be clear-eyed recognition that it is pushing the United States  to toward abolition of national sovereignty.  From Supreme Court  advocacy of international and foreign country law as superseding the  Constitution, to "sensitive" foreign policy that must be pre-approved  by the UN, we are barreling down the slippery slope to socialist  impoverishment and domination by foreign powers.Thomas E. Brewton is a staff writer for the New Media Alliance, Inc.  The New Media Alliance is a non-profit (501c3) national coalition of  writers, journalists and grass-roots media outlets.