What is more dangerous, the radical feminism of the 1960s or the conservative appearing feminism of today that is more camouflaged? Topic: Today Brannon explains why he believes Megyn Kelly and many of the women of Fox News as well as other so called conservative pundits are promoting a more dangerous brand of feminism than that of Gloria Steinem. Topic: If female journalists or broadcasters or other such female professionals want to be treated like men and valued for their brains, ability, and achievements then why do some female professionals pose for what appears to be sexually provocative magazine shoots? Why do many female journalists or broadcasters wear clothing that is so revealing, including showing cleavage if they want to be treated like men? Do we see the male journalists and broadcasters dressing provocatively or posing for provocative photo shoots? Do the so-called conservative feminists of today want to have it both ways based on when it suits them? Topic: Most of the radical feminists of the 1960s were pro-abortion, pro-homosexual, pro-erotica, and pro-promiscuity. How are the so-called conservative feminists of today any different except they claim to be republicans and are willing to wear provocative clothing if it gets them more attention while seemingly claiming they want to be treated just like the men? Topic: Has anyone noticed that Fox News Channel seems to put many of their female broadcasters in clothing that is less than professional? Can a journalist be taken seriously if they do not act or dress professionally? Do such journalists have the credibility to ask Presidential candidates if they are qualified to be taken seriously as a candidate? Topic: When did news programs become more like a tabloid magazine and what does this say about the American culture and news industry? Topic: Our phone lines light up on this topic?