Re: Re: Re: Noahs Ark? For Real
| Posted On: 07/19/06 05:51:00 AM |
Age 79, OH |
Jesus said: "Blessed are those who have not seen and yet believe"
|
Re: Re: Noahs Ark? For Real
| Posted On: 07/18/06 09:17:38 PM |
Age 60, WA |
Your question "Biblical Flood & Noah's Ark? For real or Myth" is a little misleading.
Myth is the deepest truth.
(so perhaps there are not as many unbelievers as some have interpreted the poll to indicate).
Webster lists 4 definitions for Myth, the first two (in order of use) refer to a story that is fundamentally TRUE.
The Bible we use today springs from the Worlds best scholars who had such faith they prayed constantly that they would be inspired to translate accurately.
They did a great job on the KJV and the story doesn't seem to be intended to turn Ararat into Mecca; but to demonstrate Gods Sovreignity.
Hooray if this turns out to be a faith-builder (evidence of accuracy in translation)!
...MS.
---------------
ersion)
|
Re: Noah?s Ark? For Real
| Posted On: 07/17/06 05:36:41 AM |
Age 51, TX |
FINDING OR NOT FINDING THE ARK (SHIP) CAN NOT BOTHER ME, BECAUSE OF MY FAITH IS ALWAYS THERE WITH ME. BUT THESE PEOPLE(DR. BOB AND THE BASE RESEARCH) SHOULD KEEP LOOKING FOR THE ARK. WHILE WE COMPLAIN, THEY ARE OUT LOOKING FOR THE ARK. AND I THINK THATS GREAT. I BACK THEM UP 100%.
|
Re: Noahs Ark? For Real
| Posted On: 07/15/06 12:56:39 AM |
Age 45, MI |
Verifying that this is truly Noah's ark would verify the bible all the way back to Genesis chapter 6. There is no way Noah could have prepared for the flood in time if God had not told him what to do.
What else needs to be done to verify that this is indeed the ark? Is a portion of the ark still buried? Can what remains be reconstructed and compared to the biblical dimensions? Can a model be built based on what has been found, and shown to be seaworthy? Is Iran willing to allow an archeological dig by qualified people?
|
Re: Re: Noahs Ark? For Real
| Posted On: 07/14/06 07:55:37 PM |
Age 49, FL |
this is an awesome find and if proved to be true,I believe that this will only solidify the weak Christian's faith, and, make us all stronger as well. In addition, this also gives us more "ammo" when witnessing to the non-believer. However, the best part about all of this is that this throws "another" wrench in secular society and the evolutionists (who are already confused for the most part as we all know). The end is near, the harvest is now ripe (see what is now happening in Israel), this could be an excellent tool as we minister to an evil/sick society headed down the path of destruction.
|
Re: Re: Noahs Ark? For Real
| Posted On: 07/14/06 07:21:13 PM |
Age 49, FL |
this is an awesome find and if proved to be true,I believe that this will only solidify the weak Christian's faith, and, make us all stronger as well. In addition, this also gives us more "ammo" when witnessing to the non-believer. However, the best part about all of this is that this throws "another" wrench in secular society and the evolutionists (who are already confused for the most part as we all know). The end is near, the harvest is now ripe (see what is now happening in Israel), this could be an excellent tool as we minister to an evil/sick society headed down the path of destruction.
|
Im Not "Age 60, CT"
| Posted On: 07/14/06 01:18:02 PM |
Age 46, FL |
Apparantly you have me confused with the post from "Age 60, CT". I didnt offer scientists as determiners of truth. They are not - although they have disproven Christian teaching many times. Another good example of this is the many diseases that were explained away as demons. Can you imagine having a terrible infection and told it is a demon in you and its your fault because you did not pray enough. Then one day a scientist sees the truth - bacteria revealed by the new microscope. I hope you dont think modern Christianity is now above this kind of thinking.
As for your comment about "the Church" buying into what the scientists of that time told them (and therefore scientists were at fault), you cant pin this on the scientists. The church accepted the information and taught it is doctrine when there was no biblical evidence to support it. And if you didnt believe what they taught you were guilty of blasphemy. Thats cruel. And by the way, why would this information need to be taught in churh anyway?
One other comment, on this blog there are many people that accept that th structure that B.A.S.E. found is, indeed, the Ark of Noah. They accept it on face value. Is this because the research group is a Christian group? Either way the evidence is very shaky so far. If this find is proven conclusively not to be the Ark, who will anounce that they were wrong with the same force that they claimed it was real? If that becomes the case all will be quiet Im sure.
Thanks.
|
Re: Re: Noahs Ark? For Real
| Posted On: 07/14/06 09:46:48 AM |
Age 24, NJ |
Beetles live in mud and can thrive in water like many insects and marine animals...
The ark only contained animals that couldn't have survived otherwise.
|
Re: Re: Re: Re: Noahs Ark? For Real
| Posted On: 07/13/06 02:35:55 PM |
Age 16, WY |
perhaps you should look at all the evidence supporting a worldwide flood.
|
Re: Noahs Ark? For Real
| Posted On: 07/13/06 08:29:06 AM |
Age 55, KY |
I am fascinated with this new discovery and the new pictures. I have a video that was put out by Ron Phillips a few years back and would like a CD from you guys when it comes available. Will you post it on your web site when it is ready? thxx Sam
|
Re: Re: Noahs Ark? For Real
| Posted On: 07/12/06 05:04:21 PM |
Age 21, MI |
I agree with you on this one.
|
Re: Re: Noahs Ark? For Real
| Posted On: 07/12/06 08:01:42 AM |
Age 52, VA |
I find polls interesting. They certainly prove useless in determining truth. Pilot took a poll to determine the fate of Jesus. The poll was unanimous; "Crucify Him." Pilot new before he even took the poll that Jesus was innocent, yet chose to go with the poll anyway. If course we know that it was God's purpose that Jesus be crucified for our sins. Interesting how he used a poll as part of his plan.
|
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Noahs Ark? For Real
| Posted On: 07/11/06 05:59:19 PM |
Age 46, FL |
Great, but unfortunately the professor was "extinguished".
|
Re: Re: Noahs Ark? For Real
| Posted On: 07/11/06 05:23:45 PM |
Age 50, WI |
i want to reply with a different concept. you may understand it better. there are certain things even in our own lifetime that will define. first, the dino's were much larger than the human counterparts, also the animals may have been babies. dino's, because of the size found in fossils is really an indication to me that because of higher oxygen content in the dino's, they stay afloat a lot longer than the other dead animals, humans, bugs. because they were smaller, they sank sooner.sinking to the bottom of silt and mud. when was the last time archaologists found the complete fossil remains of the smaller animals? i would think that you would have to dig a lot deeper for those. also consider the water pressure applied at greater depths.the remaining sediment which moved around the planet for 150 days. you got some serious digging for them bones. and about the ark! water was deep. water also helps in petrification. the bible says that the ark landed in the mountains of ararat, not mount ararat. this mountain in iran is part of that range. dino's are probably here with us in smaller forms. after all adam was 930 years old. and no lizard lives that long anymore. the animals came under the curse of sin and death just like us. the animals die and know not why. adam was alive when all his children were alive except noah. spark
|
Re: Noah?s Ark? For Real
| Posted On: 07/11/06 09:30:33 AM |
Age 54, KY |
This is the most amazing evidence I've seen to date of what could actually be the ark. What encourages me most is the fact that the man was using the Bible in verification of the ark location, not just the name of a mountain in Turkey today. The Word of God is always true and this petrified wood with the sea fossils surrounding it is the best physical evidence to date of Noah's ark.
We should not be surprised or amazed to find evidence supporting Scripture because it is all true. It sure is exciting to view these pics and video.
Jesus performed signs and wonders to help us weak souls take faith in Him. I'm sure glad about that. Finding the Ark will help some folks, too. We should all be encouraged by such things.
|
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Noahs Ark? For Real
| Posted On: 07/11/06 03:09:58 AM |
Age 26, CA |
I agree with you. Thanks
|
Re: Re: Noahs Ark? For Real
| Posted On: 07/11/06 02:58:06 AM |
Age 26, CA |
I feel really sorry for you)-:
Honestly and truly.
I think you might try reading the book....
"The Case for a Creator" author, Lee Strobel
I have read it, this book gives SCIENTIFIC EVIDENCE THAT POINTS TOWARDS GOD. Once you read this book I think you might start re- evaluating your heart.
I hope this will help you out.
|
Re: Noahs Ark? For Real
| Posted On: 07/10/06 01:45:30 PM |
Age 40, NJ |
Only 10% of the people who took the poll so far believe that God told the truth when He inspired Moses to write the account of Noah's ark. If God lied about that, what else in the Bible did God lie about???? If He lied, then He is NOT God and NOTHING in the Bible can be trusted to be true. I choose to believe God who said that He is not a man that He should lie (Numbers 23:19). It's time to believe God who is perfect and not fallible man's ideas concerning this issue. For more info google Answers in Genesis.
|
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Noahs Ark? For Real
| Posted On: 07/10/06 05:56:33 AM |
Age 52, VA |
I never offered scientists as determiners of truth. You did! I'll stick with the Bible. (Oh by the way, it was scientists that convinced "the church" that the earth was the center of the universe. The church unfortunatley, bought the lie.)
|
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Noahs Ark? For Real
| Posted On: 07/09/06 02:17:49 PM |
Age 46, FL |
Of course there has NEVER been a Christian that fabricated ANYTHING in the history of religion. Except for:
"The world is the center of the universe. The universe revolves around the earth." Taught as word by the Church. Galileo looked through his new invention - the telescope - and saw that the Church was wrong. He was put under house arrest for the remainder of his life for teaching against the Church - for teaching truth.
Witch hunts. Test: Dunk them. If they sink they're innocent. Of course they die when they sink. But if they float - WITCH! Burn them!
Crusades - killing in the name of God. How far against Jesus Christ was that?
And many other outrageous ideas and fabrications about both the physical and spiritual world by Christians.
Does that disprove Christianity? NO! We can easily pick out scientists OR Christians who were proven to be wrong about their teachings. What does picking and choosing from either lot prove? Nothing. Either party is capable of wrong thinking. (I do not believe man evolved from nothing. We were created. But your offer of evidence that scientists are wrong is invalid.)
|
|
|
|
|
