not a practical decision at all
| Posted On: 06/07/08 02:11:16 AM |
Age 48, IL |
I believe that decision was the most woman-hating decision to date. Even if there had been denial of the right to vote it would not have topped this! This David Paterson must really have hated his female family members. Even women who have penchant for unnatural uses of their God-given bodies are hurt by this and don't know it. If a man wants to dump his wife and kids, all he has to do is find a man and "marry" him. It could be his business partner who wants to dump his family too...Divorce hurts kids and makes more big business for attorneys and child welfare workers. Then next comes justification for ownership of many female spouses, but no! We'll have to make it "equal"--one woman to "service" many spouses maybe, like a timeshare piece of furniture in a sci-fi. How convenient--legalized whoredom. What if she wants to marry her dog?--let's legalize beastiality. How soon before prisons won't have to be single sex--dangerous for the smaller-boned and weaker-muscled women, which is a major reason why men are paired in marriage to women in the first place, to protect them--So let's legalize Sadism and Masochism, and now weddings in cellblocks have become commonplace...men to men, women to women, men to women to men to women...Legalized orgies and all jumping around like rabbits and required by law to be on the latest sexual performance-enhancing pill, so no one gets cheated. The doctors benefit by all the cardiac patients created by the drugs. The floodgates have been opened for all kinds of...dare I say it? Oh, that's right, we're promised God's wrath won't require floodgates, which proved useless anyway...and it didn't either, with Sodom and Gomorrah...My bet is, there's still plenty of power from Where that came. I know I've gotten a bit extreme, but my question still pervades: Whatever happened to Chivalry over a woman's honor? If her husband doesn't want to support her, he now has easier means to avoid supporting her. And now a manly-looking woman won't have a chance with a fellow who might have found her attractive because the competition will be able to lift more weights...
|
SATANS PLAN TO DESTROY MAN
| Posted On: 06/04/08 12:06:22 PM |
Age 64, OH |
Many Christians do not think that angels can procreate with humans. But let us look at the scriptures and see if we can learn from them. Gen 6:1 When men began to increase in number on the earth and daughters were born to them, 2 the sons of God saw that the daughters of men were beautiful, and they married any of them they chose. 3 Then the LORD said, "My Spirit will not contend with man forever, for he is mortal ; his days will be a hundred and twenty years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he Nephilim were on the earth in those days—and also afterward—when the sons of God went to the daughters of men and had children by them. They were the heroes of old, men of renown.-- THESE NEPHILIM WERE THE RESULT OF THIS UNHOLY UNION.-- 5 The LORD saw how great man's wickedness on the earth had become, and that every inclination of the thoughts of his heart was only evil all the time. 6 The LORD was grieved that he had made man on the earth, and his heart was filled with pain. 7 So the LORD said, "I will wipe mankind, whom I have created, from the face of the earth—men and animals, and creatures that move along the ground, and birds of the air—for I am grieved that I have made them." 8 But Noah found favor in the eyes of the LORD. --THE SCRIPTURES TELL US TO AVOID SEXUAL SIN ABOVE ALL OTHERS. FOR WE BECOME ONE WITH WHOEVER WE HAVE SEX WITH. THE NATURAL IS A SIGN OF THE SPIRITUAL. IF YOU HAVE SEX WITH SOMEONE WHO HAS A PHYSICAL DISEASE THEN YOU GET IT. IF YOU HAVE SEX WITH SOMEONE WHO HAS A SPIRITUAL DISEASE THEN YOU GET IT. THE FALLEN ANGELS WERE UNREDEEMABLE SO EVERY WOMAN WHO HAD SEX WITH THEM WAS UNREDEEMABLE AND THE CHILDREN WERE ALSO. THIS DEATH WOULD SPREAD LIKE A PLAQUE ACROSS THE EARTH. SO GOD JUST WASHED THE PLAQUE AWAY WITH THE FLOOD. GOD DID NOT DESTROY MAN BUT SATAN DID. GOD DID NOT DESTROY ANY MAN WHO WAS REDEEMABLE BUT ONLY WASHED AWAY THE UNREDEEMABLE ONES SO THERE WOULD BE A REMNANT TO BRING FORTH THE LORD JESUS CHRIST SO MEN COULD BE REDEEMED BY HIS BLOOD. THIS WAS SATAN'S GREAT PLAN TO DESTROY MAN AND HE DESTROYED ALL BUT EIGHT. NOW IN THESE LAST DAYS SATAN IS TRYING ANOTHER PLAN. HYBRID HUMANS, HOMOSEXUAL MARRIAGE, MARRIAGE BETWEEN ANIMALS AND MEN WILL BE NEXT. IT IS ALL PART OF SATAN'S PLAN TO DESTROY MAN.-- Lou
|
|
|
|
|
